Sponsored by

Good morning to everyone who thinks the robot trade is a Tesla trade.

JPMorgan just published a chart showing America wanting nearly 30x more humanoid robots this year than the industry can build.

A gap that size gets filled by somebody.

Today we follow that shortage down to the part causing it.

How 2M+ Professionals Stay Ahead on AI

AI is moving fast and most people are falling behind. 

The Rundown AI keeps you ahead of the curve. 

It's a free AI newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on the latest AI news, and teaches you how to apply it in just 5 minutes a day.

Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses — tailored to your needs.

JPMorgan's new humanoid research has one chart worth staring at.

US demand for humanoid robots rises from roughly 18,886 units this year to 531,471 units by 2030. Production that year tops out near 300,000.

Those two lines never meet, so the shortage is still there in 2030.

Demand climbs that fast because of labor math.

JPMorgan puts the cost of running a humanoid under $10 per hour against roughly $30 per hour for a warehouse worker, in a manufacturing sector already sitting on jobs it cannot fill.

A machine that works at a third of the price, in a role nobody applies for, sells itself. Demand is the easy half.

Building them is the hard half.

Tesla only just started, with Optimus lines going into Fremont this summer, targeting roughly 1 million units a year there and eventually 10 million at Giga Texas.

JPMorgan found Tesla largely on schedule, yet the ramp stays deliberately slow.

Optimus contains roughly 10,000 unique parts, and almost none of them have an existing supply chain to buy from.

Every one of those parts has to come from somewhere.

Something big is coming to Second Order! 🤖

We’re building a new way to help you go beyond understanding the AI revolution and start acting on it.

Your vote will help decide what we build first.

Thanks for helping us build it right. Now, back to it.

The thing standing between America and 500,000 robots is a gearbox.

Every joint in a humanoid needs a precision reducer.

A motor spins fast and weak, an elbow has to move slow, strong and exactly where you told it, and the reducer turns one into the other.

Reducers are the hardest item on the parts list, and the market supplying them is small and old.

Harmonic Drive Systems (Tokyo: 6324) makes roughly 85% of the world's strain wave gears and ships to Boston Dynamics, Figure AI and Tesla.

Nabtesco (Tokyo: 6268) holds about 60% of the heavier reducers used in hips and knees, and its operating profit jumped 60% year over year.

Nidec (Tokyo: 6594) is packaging motor, gearbox and controller into a single unit built for humanoids.

Those three are already the bottleneck at 18,886 robots a year.

Demand rises 28x by 2030 while the number of firms who can machine a gear to that tolerance stays flat, and a squeeze that long hands the pricing power to whoever cuts the gears.

So what does this mean for your portfolio?

The assembly bet $TSLA ( ▼ 2.26% ) pays you for picking which robot wins.

The component bet pays you on every robot built by anyone, because they all buy the same joints, and $KOID ( ▼ 2.03% ) and $HUMN ( ▼ 1.83% ) bundle that layer into one ticker.

The gear makers get paid first. They collect for years while the robot builders are still arguing about who ships.

The robot race will crown a winner at the top. It already has a toll booth at the bottom.

That’s it for today!

Login or Subscribe to participate

Second Order is for information and entertainment only and is not financial advice.

We are not licensed financial advisors.

Any tickers or companies mentioned are our opinions, not recommendations to buy or sell.

Do your own research and consult a professional before making investment decisions.